Today, our companions who we've had so many experiences with have all lost their spots in the physical world. Many have gone missing, have been broken, or been tossed out into the trash. Max, the once loved hero of our stories, now sits in some tucked away box, torn and stained through mishandling. Yet here's the thing, none of the physical things matter because all of our experiences existed as an addition to reality; it never bothered us if one of our animals had lost an ear because our imagination could always fill in the gaps and small errors of reality.
Currently, in our hypercritical society, even our wonderfully treasured childhood cannot escape the judgment. Prager makes a convincing argument on the effects that Barbie has had on the younger generations. She notices all the mechanical design errors that might've been purposeful in Barbie's creation: her breasts are proportionally far too large to be realistic, her skin is perfectly shaded in one color and completely hairless, and she lacks all the softness associated with feminity.
Despite all the rhetoric, I have to make a case for Barbie. To my sister and I, Barbie was never the symbol for over-sexualization, but a friend and companion we traveled with. We never noticed the peculiar features of Barbie and we've certainly never even compared Barbie to any real life person. Prager argues that Barbie is a symbol for male domination, but in our world, she was a strong-willed charismatic leader for the other toys. And to argue that "Barbie and Ken could never make love"(Prager 355) was complete and utter silliness. For all we cared, Barbie and Ken could love each other as much as they desired, because sex was never a part of it.
I can feel my inner child get angry with the criticism of Barbie, who at the time was such a close and dear friend. Such harsh criticism of a character held so sacred in memory is almost insulting to childhood. As children, we were always more focused on the fictional world of make believe rather than the concrete physical properties of our toys. Certainly, we never noticed the over exaggeration of Barbie and never believed that she had any malicious intent. Even as children, we knew that toys were never meant to be a reflection on reality.
It's almost silly that we are so openly nit-picky with our critiques. We formulate our judgment in rapid fashion, arguing convincingly that pink elephants don't represent reality enough, batman's incredible physique is causing the loss of self-esteem in young men, or even that all the toys in our market are subtly brainwashing children into agreeing with commercialism. Even Jesus, who was tortured and crucified didn't judge the Romans who killed him as much as we are judging the toys that our children enjoy.
Once upon a time, innocence reigned supreme and creativity and openness were valued above the constraining, binding rules so easily offended. Maybe the apocalypse won't be caused by zombies or mass warfare, but might be induced by the six-inch tall plastic dolls which so cruelly represent the underlying evils of society. My childish argument would've screamed for people to stop being so serious and that such petty things don't matter. Hopefully, that didn't offend too many people.


